Scientific Feedback/Review: Saving a Million Lives with Smaller Vaccine Doses

AstraZeneca accidentally gave 2700 trial participants half a dose of the Covid-19 vaccine and it resulted in 90% efficacy for that group. That lucky mistake led me on a journey to discover and prove that smaller vaccine doses could end the pandemic within a few short months and save nearly a million lives or more. So, why do I need your help? I need feedback fast. Scientists are busy and don't know me. This is not about editing/writing. Please don't focus there. I'm sure it could be improved some, but this is about the higher level concept and merit as perceived by the scientific community (you) and what your thoughts are as you read it. And why you like it or dislike it. Or how you think it will be rejected or accepted, and why. Thank you for the help! In case you're a scientist in a different field and need some credentials to help take it seriouslly, please note the following feedback already: Dr. Jonathan Dinman - Professor and ChairDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics at UMD "An ounce of protection is worth a pound of cure. Unfortunately, the FDA regs and protocols are set up to confound sensible approaches like yours. It is probably impossible for them to alter the vaccination guidelines in any reasonable amount of time. " Dr. Michel Nussenzweig head of the Laboratory of Molecular Immunology at The Rockefeller University and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Senior Physician. "The idea you’re proposing is not crazy.” And that Dr. Fauci probably would say “this is not a bad idea”. "Your ideas are good but to make them practical in time to make a difference you will need to do the following and all in parallel..."